|
AUC (percent) values for Datasets 1 and 2 for eight methods |
||||||
| MAS |
RMA |
DFW |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
| Method |
Dataset 1 |
Dataset 2 |
Dataset 1 |
Dataset 2 |
Dataset 1 |
Dataset 2 |
|
|
||||||
| WAD |
96.772(1) |
97.684(1) |
99.980(1) |
98.240(4) |
100.00(1) |
99.953(1) |
| AD |
83.381(6) |
96.430(8) |
99.897(6) |
98.631(2) |
100.00(1) |
99.948(2) |
| FC |
83.092(7) |
96.445(7) |
99.655(8) |
98.617(3) |
100.00(1) |
99.948(2) |
| RP |
81.981(8) |
96.626(6) |
99.757(7) |
99.161(1) |
99.993(4) |
99.938(3) |
| modT |
93.257(4) |
97.561(4) |
99.928(5) |
98.109(7) |
99.983(7) |
98.459(6) |
| samT |
94.002(3) |
97.547(5) |
99.944(3) |
98.139(6) |
99.988(5) |
98.656(4) |
| shrinkT |
92.379(5) |
97.617(3) |
99.955(2) |
97.846(8) |
99.984(6) |
98.558(5) |
| ibmT |
94.693(2) |
97.618(2) |
99.941(4) |
98.183(5) |
99.983(7) |
98.455(7) |
|
Numbers in parentheses show the rankings. Signal intensities smaller than 1 in the MAS-preprocessed data were set to 1 so that the logarithm of the data could be taken. | ||||||
Kadota et al. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2008 3:8 doi:10.1186/1748-7188-3-8 |
||||||