|
Comparison of STM to competing clustering methods for clusters with 5 or more members |
|||||
| Method |
Number |
Size |
Discard(%) |
Function |
Location |
|
|
|||||
| STM |
60 |
40.1 |
7.8 |
13.7 |
7.42 |
| Maximal clique |
120 |
5.65 |
98.4 |
10.6 |
7.93 |
| Quasi clique |
103 |
11.2 |
80.8 |
11.5 |
6.58 |
| Samantha |
64 |
7.9 |
79.9 |
9.16 |
4.89 |
| Minimum cut |
114 |
13.5 |
35.0 |
8.36 |
4.75 |
| Bwtweenness cut |
180 |
10.26 |
21.0 |
8.19 |
4.18 |
| MCL |
163 |
9.79 |
36.7 |
8.18 |
3.97 |
|
Comparison of STM to competing clustering methods for the yeast protein-protein interaction data set for clusters with 5 or more members. The Number column indicates the number of clusters identified by each method, the Size column indicates the average number of proteins in each cluster; the Discard% indicates the percentage of proteins not assigned to any cluster. The -log p values for biological function and cellular location are shown. | |||||
Hwang et al. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2006 1:24 doi:10.1186/1748-7188-1-24 |
|||||